NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ENOVA TECHNOLOGY CORP., Appellant

v

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC., SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, Appellees ______________________

2016-1287 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00683. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DARRYL MICHAEL WOO, Vinson & Elkins LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHAO WANG; JANICE TA, Austin, TX.

DAVID J.F. GROSS, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minne- apolis, MN, argued for appellees. Also represented by LUCAS J. TOMSICH, JULIE WAHLSTRAND; CALVIN L. LITSEY, East Palo Alto, CA; RICHARD M. MARSH, JR., Denver, CO. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court