Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.
Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
XILINX, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2016-2323 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Har- dy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER.
MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland, OH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished