Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

XILINX, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2016-2323 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Har- dy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER.

MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland, OH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished