Linkgine, Inc. v. Viglink, Inc.
Linkgine, Inc. v. Viglink, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
LINKGINE, INC., Appellant
v.
VIGLINK, INC., SKIMLINKS, INC., SKIMBIT, LTD., Appellees ______________________
2016-2087, 2016-2088 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00184, CBM2014-00185, CBM2015-00086, CBM2015-00087. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
KIMBERLY L. BOLDT, Boldt Law Firm, PA, Boca Raton, FL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY DAVID MUELLER, MARIO R. GIOMMONI; WILLIAM C. HEARON, William C. Hearon, PA, Miami, FL.
RICHARD MARTINELLI, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Also represent- ed by DONALD E. DAYBELL, Irvine, CA. Appellees Skim- links, Inc., Skimbit, Ltd. also represented by CATRINA WANNING WANG, New York, NY.
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 11, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished