Prasad v. Opm
Prasad v. Opm
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CHANNAVJJALA M. PRASAD, Petitioner
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent ______________________
2016-2267 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-0831-14-1114-I-2. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
E. JOHN STEREN, Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
MICHAEL ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ALLISON KIDD-MILLER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 15, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished