Vocke v. Merit Systems Protection Board

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Vocke v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 868 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
2017 WL 3081702; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13056

Vocke v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Opinion of the Court

WALLACH, Circuit Judge,

with whom NEWMAN and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges, join, dissent from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc for the reasons stated in the dissent from denial of the petition for rehearing en banc in Fedora v. Merit Systems Protection Board, No. 15-3039.

STOLL, Circuit Judge, dissents without opinion from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

070rehearing

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Petitioner Robert D. Vocke, Jr. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by respondent Merit Systems Protection Board. The petition was first referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

The mandate of the court will issue on July 27, 2017.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert D. VOCKE, Jr., Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent
Status
Published