MacIas v. Army
MacIas v. Army
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MICHAEL L. MACIAS, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent ______________________
2016-2508 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-15-0385-I-2. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DAVID PAUL CLISHAM, Clisham & Sortor, San Francis- co, CA, argued for petitioner. Also represented by JUSTINE LIV CLISHAM.
RETA EMMA BEZAK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., CHAD A. READLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 24, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished