In Re: Radcliffe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In Re: Radcliffe

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: WILLIAM H. RADCLIFFE, Appellant ______________________

2017-1069 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/804,454. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MATHEW PERRONE, JR., Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr., Algonquin, IL, argued for appellant.

AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JEREMIAH HELM. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 8, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished