U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2017

In Re: Radcliffe

In Re: Radcliffe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 8, 2017

In Re: Radcliffe

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: WILLIAM H. RADCLIFFE, Appellant ______________________ 2017-1069 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/804,454. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MATHEW PERRONE, JR., Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr., Algonquin, IL, argued for appellant.

AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K.

KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JEREMIAH HELM. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 8, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.