Faro v. Matal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Faro v. Matal

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JOHN H. FARO, Petitioner-Appellant

v.

JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, Respondent-Appellee ______________________

2016-2716 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:16-cv-00320-GBL- TCB, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN H. FARO, Faro & Associates, Miami, FL, argued pro se.

ANDREW SUN HAN, Office of the United States Attor- ney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, VA, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by DANA J. BOENTE. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, PLAGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 4, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished