In Re: Levenstein
In Re: Levenstein
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: LAWRENCE M. LEVENSTEIN, Appellant ______________________
2017-1067 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/212,998. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN S. NAGY, II, Fulwider Patton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant.
ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SARAH E. CRAVEN. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished