In Re: Rissio

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In Re: Rissio

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: JOHN RISSIO, JOHN CAMERON, Appellants ______________________

2017-1090 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/672,385. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JAMES W. PROSCIA, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI, argued for appellants. Also represented by MARK A. CANTOR.

KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished