In Re: Rissio
In Re: Rissio
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: JOHN RISSIO, JOHN CAMERON, Appellants ______________________
2017-1090 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/672,385. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JAMES W. PROSCIA, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI, argued for appellants. Also represented by MARK A. CANTOR.
KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished