Musselman v. Department of the Army

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Musselman v. Department of the Army, 868 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
2017 WL 3081819; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13055

Musselman v. Department of the Army

Opinion of the Court

WALLACH, Circuit Judge,

with whom NEWMAN and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges, join, dissent from the denial of the petition for hearing en banc for the reasons stated in the dissent from denial of the petition for rehearing en banc in Fedora v. Merit Systems Protection Board, No. 15-3039.

STOLL, Circuit Judge, dissents without opinion from the denial of the petition for hearing en banc.

070rehearing

ON PETITION FOR HEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Petitioner Jeffery S. Musselman filed a petition for initial hearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by respondent Department of the Army. The petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for initial hearing en banc is denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jeffery S. MUSSELMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY
Status
Published