U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2017

Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal

Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided October 24, 2017 · Bryson, Prost, Wallach
698 F. App'x 1036

Counsel

Darren Edward Donnelly, Fenwick & West,- LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Jason E. Amsel; Eman Sojoodi, San Francisco, CA., Jeremiah Helm, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for interve-nor. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Scott Weidenfeller, Robert McBride.

Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Prost, Chief Judge.

In light of this court’s en banc decision in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, 872 F.3d 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (en banc), the judgment of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is vacated and this case is remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with Aqua.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.