In Re: Burgos

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In Re: Burgos

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: RAFAEL BURGOS, JUAN HANCKE, EVELYN JARA, MARIA HIDALGO, Appellants ______________________

2017-1714 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/076,117. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants.

AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 12, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished