In Re: Burgos
In Re: Burgos
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: RAFAEL BURGOS, JUAN HANCKE, EVELYN JARA, MARIA HIDALGO, Appellants ______________________
2017-1714 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/076,117. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants.
AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 12, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished