U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2018

Ppc Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications

Ppc Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided March 13, 2018

Ppc Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PPC BROADBAND, INC., DBA PPC, FKA JOHN MEZZALINGUA ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS RF, LLC, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2017-1347 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in No. 5:11-cv-00761-GLS- DEP, Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ J. MICHAEL JAKES, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by JOSE M. RECIO; ROBERT L. BURNS, II, Reston, VA; JUSTIN A. HENDRIX, Palo Alto, CA; JOHN D. COOK, DOUGLAS J. NASH, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY; JOHN T. GUTKOSKI, Boston, MA.

KIMBALL RICHARD ANDERSON, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellant. Also repre- sented by HOWARD I. SHIN, New York, NY; MARK S.

DAVIES, KATHERINE M. KOPP, Orrick, Herrington & Sut- cliffe LLP, Washington, DC; ELIZABETH MOULTON, Menlo Park, CA; DANIEL A. RUBENS, New York, NY; JOSEPH P. LAVELLE, DLA Piper US LLP, Washington, DC.

CLYDE MOODY SIEBMAN, Siebman, Burg, Phillips & Smith, LLP, Sherman, TX, for amicus curiae Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.