Ppc Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications
Ppc Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PPC BROADBAND, INC., DBA PPC, FKA JOHN MEZZALINGUA ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS RF, LLC, Defendant-Appellant ______________________
2017-1347 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in No. 5:11-cv-00761-GLS- DEP, Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
J. MICHAEL JAKES, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by JOSE M. RECIO; ROBERT L. BURNS, II, Reston, VA; JUSTIN A. HENDRIX, Palo Alto, CA; JOHN D. COOK, DOUGLAS J. NASH, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY; JOHN T. GUTKOSKI, Boston, MA. KIMBALL RICHARD ANDERSON, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellant. Also repre- sented by HOWARD I. SHIN, New York, NY; MARK S. DAVIES, KATHERINE M. KOPP, Orrick, Herrington & Sut- cliffe LLP, Washington, DC; ELIZABETH MOULTON, Menlo Park, CA; DANIEL A. RUBENS, New York, NY; JOSEPH P. LAVELLE, DLA Piper US LLP, Washington, DC.
CLYDE MOODY SIEBMAN, Siebman, Burg, Phillips & Smith, LLP, Sherman, TX, for amicus curiae Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished