Howell v. Ooc
Howell v. Ooc
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CORY HOWELL, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent ______________________ 2017-1755, 2017-1757 ______________________ Petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Di- rectors of the Office of Compliance in Nos. 14-AC-08 (DA,FM,FL,RP), 14-AC-41 (DA,FM,FL,RP). ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JEFFREY HOWARD LEIB, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
JOHN D. UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel, United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (REYNA, CLEVENGER, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 5, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.