Finisar Corporation v. Nistica, Inc.
Finisar Corporation v. Nistica, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FINISAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NISTICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2017-1649 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:13-cv-03345-BLF, Judge Beth Labson Freeman. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID C. RADULESCU, Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ROBIN M. DAVIS, DANIEL KESACK, ETAI LAHAV, TIGRAN VARDANIAN.
ROBERT KRAMER, Dentons US LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JENNIFER D. BENNETT, RUSSELL TONKOVICH, San Francis- co, CA; LORA A. BRZEZYNSKI, Washington, DC; RICHARD SALGADO, Dallas, TX. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judg- es).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 5, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.