Digital Ally, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc.
Digital Ally, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2017-2296 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:16-cv-02032-CM-TJJ, Judge Carlos Murguia. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JAMES F.B. DANIELS, McDowell, Rice, Smith & Bu- chanan, PC, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiff- appellant.
PAMELA BETH PETERSEN, Axon Enterprise, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN D. GARRETSON, LYNN C. HERNDON, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 2, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished