Neology, Inc. v. Kapsch Trafficcom Ivhs Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Neology, Inc. v. Kapsch Trafficcom Ivhs Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NEOLOGY, INC., Appellant

v.

KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM IVHS INC., KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM HOLDING CORP., Appellees ______________________

2017-1228, 2017-1229 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00818, IPR2015-00819. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROBERT H. SLOSS, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Sa- vitch LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR FELIX, San Diego, CA.

NATHAN S. MAMMEN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by GREGG F. LOCASCIO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 6, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished