Quest Licensing Corporation v. Bloomberg Lp
Quest Licensing Corporation v. Bloomberg Lp
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ QUEST LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. BLOOMBERG LP, BLOOMBERG FINANCE LP, INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION, THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, CHARLES SCHWAB & CO. INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2017-1561 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:14-cv-00561-GMS, 1:14-cv- 00562-GMS, 1:14-cv-00563-GMS, 1:14-cv-00564-GMS, 1:14-cv-00727-GMS, Judge Gregory M. Sleet. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ALFRED ROSS FABRICANT, Brown Rudnick, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represent- ed by LAWRENCE C. DRUCKER, PETER LAMBRIANAKOS, VINCENT J. RUBINO, III.
EDWARD POPLAWSKI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, argued for all defendants- appellees. Defendants-appellees Bloomberg LP, Bloom- berg Finance LP, The Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. also represented by OLIVIA M.
KIM; MICHAEL BRETT LEVIN, Palo Alto, CA; ADAM WILLIAM BURROWBRIDGE, Washington, DC.
ROBERT MALLIN, Brinks Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Interactive Data Corporation. Also represented by JAFON FEARSON, JAMES ROBERT SOBIERAJ. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 8, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.