In Re: Martin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In Re: Martin

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: JOHN FRANCIS MARTIN, CHARLES HENRY RODICK, Appellants ______________________

2018-1085 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/662,793. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants.

AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 10, 2018 /s/Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished