In Re: Martin
In Re: Martin
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: JOHN FRANCIS MARTIN, CHARLES HENRY RODICK, Appellants ______________________
2018-1085 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/662,793. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants.
AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 10, 2018 /s/Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished