Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLC
Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLC
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
July 19, 2018 ERRATA ______________________
Appeal Nos. 2016-1559, 2016-1893, 2016-1894
ENERGY HEATING, LLC, AN IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ROCKY MOUNTAIN OILFIELD SERVICES, LLC, AN IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION, MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Third-Party Defendants-Cross-Appellants
v.
HEAT ON-THE-FLY, LLC, A LOUISIANA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, SUPER HEATERS NORTH DAKOTA, LLC, A NORTH DAKOTA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants
Decided: May 4, 2018 Precedential Opinion ______________________
Please make the following changes: 2 ENERGY HEATING, LLC v. HEAT ON-THE-FLY, LLC
On page 16, lines 34–35, delete:
HOTF did not object
Replace the deleted language with:
no one objected
On page 17, lines 24–27, delete:
Energy, however, also called Mr. Lind, who testified that, according to Mr. Kelley, Mr. Lyles had mentioned the patent to Mr. Kelley. HOTF did not object to Mr. Lind’s testimony.
Replace the deleted language with:
HOTF, however, subsequently called Mr. Lind as an adverse witness. HOTF elicited from him the same allegedly hearsay statements to which Mr. Powell had earlier testified and to which HOTF had previously objected. No one object- ed to Mr. Lind’s testimony.
On page 17, lines 29–30, delete:
On this unusual record where HOTF did not object to Mr. Lind’s testimony,
Replace the deleted language with:
On this unusual record, where HOTF it- self elicited Mr. Lind’s testimony,
Reference
- Status
- Published