Automated Merchandising System v. Iancu
Automated Merchandising System v. Iancu
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
AUTOMATED MERCHANDISING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant
v.
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2017-1953, 2017-1954, 2017-1955, 2017-1957 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/000,604, 95/000,605, 95/000,606, 95/000,607. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JAMES DANIEL BERQUIST, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, Arlington, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PETER WHITLOCK GOWDEY, DONALD LEE JACKSON, McLean, VA.
PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT J. MCMANUS. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished