In Re: Patterson
In Re: Patterson
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: JAMES PATTERSON, NATHAN MOODY, Appellants ______________________
2017-2364 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/103,813. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ANDREW V. TRASK, Williams & Connolly LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES SHERWOOD, Google LLC, Washington, DC.
ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MARY L. KELLY, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. The parties shall bear their own costs.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished