U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2018

In Re: Patterson

In Re: Patterson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided October 10, 2018

In Re: Patterson

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: JAMES PATTERSON, NATHAN MOODY, Appellants ______________________ 2017-2364 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/103,813. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ANDREW V. TRASK, Williams & Connolly LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES SHERWOOD, Google LLC, Washington, DC.

ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MARY L. KELLY, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.