NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent

UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE LABOR COMMITTEE, Intervenor ______________________

2017-2060, 2017-2062, 2017-2063, 2017-2064 ______________________

Petitions for review of decisions of the Board of Direc- tors of the Office of Compliance in Nos. 16-LM-03 (NG), 16-LM-04 (NG), 16-LM-05 (NG), 16-LM-06 (NG). ______________________

Decided: November 6, 2018 ______________________

FREDERICK M. HERRERA, Office of Employment Coun- sel, United States Capitol Police, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by RAFIQUE OMAR ANDERSON, KELLY MARISSA SCINDIAN.

JOHN D. UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel, 2 US CAPITOL POLICE v. OOC

United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by JULIA AKINS CLARK.

MEGAN KATHLEEN MECHAK, Woodley & McGillivary LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. ______________________

Before DYK, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The petitions for review are dismissed for lack of ju- risdiction in this court. See U.S. Capitol Police v. Office of Compliance, Nos. 2017-2061, 2018-1504, slip op. at 8–12 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2018). No costs. DISMISSED