Daneshvar v. Kipke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Daneshvar v. Kipke

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EUGENE D. DANESHVAR, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DARYL R. KIPKE, NEURONEXUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________

2017-2515 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:13-cv-13096-SJM- APP, Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

WILLIAM ALCIATI, Gardella Grace PA, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by GREG GARDELLA.

J. MICHAEL HUGET, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for defendants- appellees. Also represented by SARAH E. WAIDELICH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 19, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unknown