Daneshvar v. Kipke
Daneshvar v. Kipke
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
EUGENE D. DANESHVAR, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
DARYL R. KIPKE, NEURONEXUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________
2017-2515 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:13-cv-13096-SJM- APP, Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
WILLIAM ALCIATI, Gardella Grace PA, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by GREG GARDELLA.
J. MICHAEL HUGET, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for defendants- appellees. Also represented by SARAH E. WAIDELICH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 19, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unknown