Daneshvar v. Kipke
Daneshvar v. Kipke
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ EUGENE D. DANESHVAR, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DARYL R. KIPKE, NEURONEXUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2017-2515 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:13-cv-13096-SJM- APP, Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WILLIAM ALCIATI, Gardella Grace PA, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by GREG GARDELLA.
J. MICHAEL HUGET, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for defendants- appellees. Also represented by SARAH E. WAIDELICH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 19, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.