NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

AC TECHNOLOGIES S.A., Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Appellees ______________________

2017-1999 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015- 01804. ______________________

Decided: January 9, 2019 ______________________

MINGHUI YANG, Hardy Parrish Yang, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR G. HARDY.

DANIEL T. SHVODIAN, Perkins Coie, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER LEE KELLEY, WING LIANG, VICTORIA Q. SMITH; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH. ______________________ 2 AC TECHS. v. AMAZON.COM

Before MOORE, SCHALL, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. STOLL, Circuit Judge. Before us is AC Technologies S.A.’s appeal of the Pa- tent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision that all claims of U.S. Patent 8,656,125 are unpatentable. On appeal, AC raises arguments substantially identical to those we rejected today in AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 18-1433. For the reasons explained in that decision, we affirm the Board. AFFIRMED COSTS Costs to Appellees.