Smart Modular Technologies v. Iancu
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Appellant v.
ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor ______________________
2018-1557 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,399.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL FRANCIS HEAFEY, Troutman Sanders LLP,
San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant.
MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 7, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.