NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

PICIS, INC., QUADRAMED CORPORATION, N. HARRIS COMPUTER CORP., OPTUMINSIGHT, INC., NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees

PRACTICE FUSION, INC., Defendant ______________________

2017-2171 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:16-cv-00463-RWS, 6:16- cv-00465-RWS, 6:16-cv-00466-RWS, 6:16-cv-00467-RWS, 6:16-cv-00468-RWS, 6:16-cv-00470-RWS, 6:16-cv-00471- RWS, 6:16-cv-00472-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

BRETT MANGRUM, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by RYAN S. LOVELESS, JAMES ETHERIDGE. HARNAIK S. KAHLON, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila, Chicago, IL, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defend- ant-appellee Netsmart Technologies, Inc. also represented by ASHLEY TAYLOR CORBITT.

MICHAEL A. ALBERT, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, for defendants-appellees Picis, Inc., Quadra- Med Corporation, N. Harris Computer Corp. Also repre- sented by HUNTER D. KEETON, MARIE MCKIERNAN, AUSTIN STEELMAN.

PETER J. CHASSMAN, Reed Smith, Houston, TX, for de- fendant-appellee OptumInsight, Inc. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court