U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2019

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Picis, Inc.

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Picis, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided February 8, 2019
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Picis, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants v.

PICIS, INC., QUADRAMED CORPORATION, N.

HARRIS COMPUTER CORP., OPTUMINSIGHT, INC., NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

PRACTICE FUSION, INC.,

Defendant ______________________ 2017-2171 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:16-cv-00463-RWS, 6:16- cv-00465-RWS, 6:16-cv-00466-RWS, 6:16-cv-00467-RWS, 6:16-cv-00468-RWS, 6:16-cv-00470-RWS, 6:16-cv-00471- RWS, 6:16-cv-00472-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________

BRETT MANGRUM, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake,

TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by RYAN S. LOVELESS, JAMES ETHERIDGE.

HARNAIK S. KAHLON, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila, Chicago, IL, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defend- ant-appellee Netsmart Technologies, Inc. also represented by ASHLEY TAYLOR CORBITT.

MICHAEL A. ALBERT, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, for defendants-appellees Picis, Inc., Quadra- Med Corporation, N. Harris Computer Corp. Also repre- sented by HUNTER D. KEETON, MARIE MCKIERNAN, AUSTIN STEELMAN.

PETER J. CHASSMAN, Reed Smith, Houston, TX, for de- fendant-appellee OptumInsight, Inc.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.