NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

E-MDS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, MERIDIANEMR, INC., HEALTHTRONICS, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., ALTARIS CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, MEDHOST, INC., COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS, INC., E-MDS, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION, HEALTHTRONICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION, AMERISOURCEBERGEN HOLDING CORPORATION, INTUITIVE MEDICAL SOFTWARE, LLC, ALTARIS HEALTH PARTNERS II, L.P., ALTARIS HEALTH PARTNERS III, L.P., AHP-HT II ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, AHP-HT III ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, INTERNATIONAL ONCOLOGY NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY GROUP, INC., VISTA EQUITY PARTNERS FUND IV, LIGHTNING ACQUISITION, LLC, EPIC HOSTING, LLC, EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CERNER HEALTH SERVICES, INC., GENERAL 2 UNILOC USA INC. v. E-MDS, INC.

ELECTRIC COMPANY, DBA GE HEALTHCARE, ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC., CERNER CORPORATION, LIGHTNING HOLDINGS, LLC, GREENWAY HEALTH, INC., GREENWAY HEALTH, LLC, GREENWAY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants ______________________

2018-1893 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:14-cv-00625-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III. ______________________

Decided: February 8, 2019 ______________________

BRETT MANGRUM, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by RYAN LOVELESS, JIM ETHERIDGE. ______________________

Before MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs-Appellants sued Defendants for infringe- ment of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,628,526 and 5,715,451. Defend- ants moved to dismiss on ineligibility grounds, and the district court partially granted this motion. Plaintiffs-Ap- pellants and Defendants subsequently settled their dispute and jointly stipulated to dismissal of the case. Plaintiffs- Appellants did not reserve the right to appeal. Accord- ingly, we dismiss this appeal for mootness pursuant to Aqua Marine Supply v. AIM Machining, Inc., 247 F.3d 1216, 1218–20 (Fed. Cir. 2001). UNILOC USA INC. v. E-MDS, INC. 3

DISMISSED