Uniloc USA, Inc. v. E-Mds, Inc.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants v.

E-MDS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, MERIDIANEMR, INC., HEALTHTRONICS, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., ALTARIS

CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, MEDHOST,

INC., COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS,

INC., E-MDS, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION, HEALTHTRONICS

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION,

AMERISOURCEBERGEN HOLDING

CORPORATION, INTUITIVE MEDICAL

SOFTWARE, LLC, ALTARIS HEALTH

PARTNERS II, L.P., ALTARIS HEALTH PARTNERS III, L.P., AHP-HT II ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, AHP-HT III ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, INTERNATIONAL

ONCOLOGY NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.,

SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA,

INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY

GROUP, INC., VISTA EQUITY

PARTNERS FUND IV, LIGHTNING ACQUISITION, LLC, EPIC HOSTING, LLC, EPIC

SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CERNER HEALTH

SERVICES, INC., GENERAL 2 UNILOC USA INC. v. E-MDS, INC.

ELECTRIC COMPANY, DBA GE HEALTHCARE, ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS,

INC., CERNER CORPORATION, LIGHTNING HOLDINGS, LLC, GREENWAY

HEALTH, INC., GREENWAY HEALTH, LLC, GREENWAY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants ______________________

2018-1893 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:14-cv-00625-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III. ______________________ Decided: February 8, 2019 ______________________ BRETT MANGRUM, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by RYAN LOVELESS, JIM ETHERIDGE. ______________________ Before MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-Appellants sued Defendants for infringe- ment of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,628,526 and 5,715,451. Defend- ants moved to dismiss on ineligibility grounds, and the district court partially granted this motion. Plaintiffs-Ap- pellants and Defendants subsequently settled their dispute and jointly stipulated to dismissal of the case. Plaintiffs- Appellants did not reserve the right to appeal. Accord- ingly, we dismiss this appeal for mootness pursuant to Aqua Marine Supply v. AIM Machining, Inc., 247 F.3d 1216, 1218–20 (Fed. Cir. 2001). UNILOC USA INC. v. E-MDS, INC. 3

DISMISSED