Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants
HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., Counterclaim Defendant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellee
SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2018-1979 ______________________
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:16-cv-02787-WHO, Judge Wil- liam H. Orrick, III. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________ 2 HUAWEI TECHS. CO., LTD. V. SAMSUNG ELECS. CO., LTD.
Before PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and HUGHES, Cir- cuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER The appellants, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., and Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., have moved to dismiss this appeal and remand the case to the district court. The appellees, Samsung Elec- tronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., and Samsung Research America, do not oppose the motion. The motion is granted, in part.
The case is remanded to the district court for the lim- ited purpose of considering Huawei’s motion for vacatur. This court takes no position regarding the merits of that motion.
The appeal will be held in abeyance pending the reso- lution of the motion for vacatur by the district court. Pur- suant to FRAP 12.1(b), the parties are directed to notify the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days of entry of the dis- trict court’s decision regarding the motion for vacatur.
FOR THE COURT
March 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished