Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES
USA, INC.,
Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants
HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
Counterclaim Defendant v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellee
SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2018-1979 ______________________
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:16-cv-02787-WHO, Judge Wil- liam H. Orrick, III.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
2 HUAWEI TECHS. CO., LTD. V. SAMSUNG ELECS. CO., LTD.
Before PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and HUGHES, Cir- cuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
The appellants, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., and Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., have moved to dismiss this appeal and remand the case to the district court. The appellees, Samsung Elec- tronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., and Samsung Research America, do not oppose the motion. The motion is granted, in part.
The case is remanded to the district court for the lim- ited purpose of considering Huawei’s motion for vacatur. This court takes no position regarding the merits of that motion.
The appeal will be held in abeyance pending the reso- lution of the motion for vacatur by the district court. Pur- suant to FRAP 12.1(b), the parties are directed to notify the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days of entry of the dis- trict court’s decision regarding the motion for vacatur.
FOR THE COURT March 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.