Sprint Communications Company v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Sprint Communications Company v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER CABLE, LLC, TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P., TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, TWC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (KANSAS), LLC, Defendants-Appellants ______________________

2017-2247 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:11-cv-02686-JWL, Judge John W. Lungstrum. ______________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC ______________________ 2 SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges *. PER CURIAM. ORDER Appellants Time Warner Cable Information Services (Kansas), LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Ca- ble, LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partner- ship and TWC Communications, LLC filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Appellee Sprint Communications Company, L.P. The petition was first referred to the panel that heard the appeal. The panel denied the petition ex- cept as described in the accompanying panel order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. (2) The mandate of this court will issue on April 24, 2019.

FOR THE COURT

March 18, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

* Circuit Judges Moore and Stoll did not participate.

Reference

Status
Unpublished