Basf Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.
Basf Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BASF CORPORATION, Appellant
v.
JOHNSON MATTHEY INC., Appellee ______________________
2018-1908, 2018-1911 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,744, 95/001,745, 95/001,894. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellant. Also represented by PRESTON HAMILTON HEARD, Atlanta, GA; ANA FRIEDMAN, Winston-Salem, NC.
DOUGLAS E. MCCANN, Fish & Richardson, PC, Wil- mington, DE, argued for appellee. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 5, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished