Wuhan Keda Marble Co., Ltd. v. Tenax S.P.A.
Wuhan Keda Marble Co., Ltd. v. Tenax S.P.A.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WUHAN KEDA MARBLE PROTECTIVE MATERIALS CO., LTD., Appellant v. TENAX S.P.A., Appellee ______________________ 2018-1900 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 91213895, 91224663. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PATRICK JAY HINES, Muncy Geissler Olds & Lowe, Fair- fax, VA, argued for appellant.
MATTHEW C. ACOSTA, Jackson Walker, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOHN MARTIN JACKSON; MICHELE S. KATZ, Advitam IP, LLC, Chicago, IL. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.