Hayden v. Air Force
Hayden v. Air Force
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CARL D. HAYDEN, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent ______________________
2018-1589 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH-4324-13-0534-M-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEPHEN J. SMITH, Schiff Hardin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
ERIN MURDOCK-PARK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by ALLISON KIDD-MILLER, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR., JOSEPH H. HUNT. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 16, 2019 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Date Jarrett B. Perlow Chief Deputy Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished