In Re: Wark
In Re: Wark
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: CYNTHIA A. WARK, Appellant ______________________ 2018-1901 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/556,359. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ THOMAS YOUNG, Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane P.C., Troy, MI, argued for appellant.
MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MOLLY R. SILFEN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (TARANTO, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.