Flamm v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Flamm v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DANIEL L. FLAMM, Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________ 2018-1832 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 01512. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROLF STADHEIM, Stadheim & Grear, Scottsdale, AZ, ar- gued for appellant.
NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (REYNA, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 7, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.