In Re: Snyder
In Re: Snyder
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: JIM SNYDER, JOON HAO CHUAH, JOE DENTE, TRAVIS HARTWELL, MORGAN HOLLINGER, JOHN THELE, JIMMY WAN, ROBERT WILLIAMS, ROBBY MORGAN, PULSELIGHT HOLDINGS, INC., Appellants ______________________ 2018-2032 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/747,868. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOSEPH ROGER WILLIAMS, JR., Richards Rodriguez & Skeith LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellants.
PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W.
KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 14, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.