In Re: Riggs

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

In Re: Riggs

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOHN H. KIVELA, ROBERT H. SHELLMAN, JOSEPH F. ROCKY, JR., RALPH K. BRECHTER, DOUGLAS L. CLARK, JAMES R. CLARK, JON L. CLOW, AMY DALEY, LARRY HU, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, WILLIAM J. LOHAN, MICHAEL M. NAUGHTON, PETER P. NELSON, ALAN D. SHOLLENBERGER, M. NADINE WILLETT, DONALD H. MUELLER, MICHAEL D. MICHAUD, ROBERT PHANEUF, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, Appellants ______________________

2018-1883 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/873,969. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROBERT BAUER, Bauer Law Offices, Pittsburgh, PA, ar- gued for appellants.

KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MICHAEL S. FORMAN, JOSEPH MATAL. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 21, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished