Panduit Corp. v. Corning Optical Communications

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Panduit Corp. v. Corning Optical Communications

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PANDUIT CORP., Appellant

v.

CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellee ______________________

2018-1999 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00009. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC.

JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished