Corning Optical Communications v. Panduit Corp.
Corning Optical Communications v. Panduit Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellant
v.
PANDUIT CORP., Appellee ______________________
2018-1903, 2018-1905, 2018-2058 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016- 01703, IPR2016-01709, IPR2017-00029. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN C. O'QUINN, HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL.
JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished