In Re: Finjan, Inc.
In Re: Finjan, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: FINJAN, INC., Appellant ______________________
2018-2354 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/013,660. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY.
MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT MCBRIDE, COKE MORGAN STEWART. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished