Flamm v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Flamm v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DANIEL L. FLAMM, Appellant v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., INTEL CORPORATION, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., Appellees ______________________ 2018-2322 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017- 00391, IPR2017-01746. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROLF STADHEIM, Stadheim & Grear, Scottsdale, AZ, ar- gued for appellant.
MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees Micron Tech- nology, Inc., Intel Corporation, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc. Appellee Micron Technology, Inc. also repre- sented by JARED BOBROW, JEREMY JASON LANG, Menlo Park, CA.
CHAD S. CAMPBELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for appellee Intel Corporation. Also represented by TYLER R. BOWEN; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH; PHILIP ALCIDE MORIN, San Diego, CA; JONATHAN L. MCFARLAND, Seattle, WA.
SHAMITA ETIENNE-CUMMINGS, White & Case LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc. Also represented by DAVID TENNANT.
NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, PLAGER and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 6, 2019 /s /Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.