Kingston Technology Co., Inc. v. Polaris Innovations Ltd.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Kingston Technology Co., Inc. v. Polaris Innovations Ltd.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC., Appellant

v.

POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Appellee ______________________

2018-1778 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 01623. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DAVID M. HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JOHN BALLANCO, Washington, DC.

NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, Lowenstein & Weather- wax LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also rep- resented by KENNETH J. WEATHERWAX. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished