Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.
Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DAICEL CORPORATION, Appellant
v.
CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________
2018-2131 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00166. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
EUGENE PEREZ, Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by GERALD MYERS MURPHY, JR.
CHARLES COLLINS-CHASE, Finnegan, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by C. COLLETTE CORSER, MICHAEL J. FLIBBERT; JUSTIN LEONARD KRIEGER, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Denver, CO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished