Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DAICEL CORPORATION, Appellant

v.

CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________

2018-2130 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00165. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

GERALD MYERS MURPHY, JR., Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by EUGENE PEREZ.

CHARLES COLLINS-CHASE, Finnegan, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by C. COLLETTE CORSER, MICHAEL J. FLIBBERT; JUSTIN LEONARD KRIEGER, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Denver, CO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished