Dsm Desotech Inc. v. Itc
Dsm Desotech Inc. v. Itc
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DSM DESOTECH INC., DSM IP ASSETS B.V., Appellants
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee
OFS FITEL, LLC, MOMENTIVE UV COATINGS (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD., Intervenors ______________________
2018-2150 ______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1031. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by RAJEEV GUPTA, KARTHIK KUMAR.
RONALD TRAUD, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, MICHELLE W. KLANCNIK.
BRADLEY JOHN OLSON, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor OFS Fitel, LLC. Also represented by CHRISTINE JULIET SOHAR HENTER, JORDAN WEINSTEIN.
EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, argued for intervenor Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Also represented by AHMED JAMAL DAVIS, Washington, DC; RYAN PATRICK O'CONNOR, San Di- ego, CA. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CLEVENGER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished