Corning Optical Communications v. Panduit Corp.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________

CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC,

Appellant v. PANDUIT CORP., Appellee ______________________ 2019-1248, 2019-1250 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017- 01073, IPR2017-01074.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL.

JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court